Immigration Law

Tuition refund disputes in Australia 2026: what your written agreement must say

How written agreements under the National Code 2018 decide tuition refund disputes, and the escalation path from internal appeal to Australian Consumer Law.

General information only. This guide explains how Australian law usually works. It is not legal advice. For a decision with real consequences, speak to a licensed Australian lawyer.

For almost every tuition refund dispute, the outcome starts with the written agreement you signed before paying. Standard 3 of the National Code of Practice for Providers of Education and Training to Overseas Students 2018 (National Code 2018) requires a registered provider to enter into a written agreement with you, signed or otherwise accepted by you, concurrently with or before accepting payment of tuition fees or non-tuition fees, and that agreement must spell out what happens on student default and what happens on provider default. This reflects the official text on the Federal Register of Legislation — the National Code 2018 (F2017L01182), Standard 3 "Formalisation of enrolment and written agreements", together with its Definitions and Part A "The Education Services for Overseas Students Framework" — as published on that official page as at September 2026. It is general information only, not advice about your enrolment or contract, and anyone weighing up a live dispute should check the current official text and get professional advice about their own agreement.

Does the written agreement really decide what gets refunded?

Yes, because the National Code deliberately does not publish a single refund table you can quote. Instead, Standard 3 requires the agreement itself to state the amounts that may or may not be repaid in the case of student default and provider default, and those amounts must be consistent with the Education Services for Overseas Students Act 2000 (ESOS Act). Two students withdrawing from similar courses can therefore end up with different results, not because the law has changed but because their agreements say different things.

That is why the first practical step in any refund disagreement is to read the refund clauses rather than argue from what a friend was refunded. Everything about timing, deductions, who can be paid and how to claim is supposed to be in that one document, written in plain English.

When must the agreement exist, and who has to sign it?

Timing matters as much as content. The agreement has to be signed or otherwise accepted concurrently with, or before, the provider accepts any tuition or non-tuition fee payment — so handing over money before seeing the terms is the exception the rule is built to prevent.

If you are under 18, the agreement must be signed or otherwise accepted by your parent or legal guardian rather than by you alone. A signature defect there is itself worth noting in a dispute, since the Standard identifies who must accept the agreement on a minor's behalf.

What the agreement must say about refunds before you sign

What must be set out Why it matters in a dispute
Amounts that may or may not be repaid, including tuition and non-tuition fees collected by education agents on behalf of the provider Refundable amounts are defined by the agreement; agent-collected fees are not outside the refund question
Processes for claiming a refund The claim route itself is a contract term, so following it is usually part of the argument
The specified person or people, other than you, who can receive a refund Determines whether a payment made to someone else counts as a refund to you
A plain English explanation of what happens if the course is not delivered, including the role of the Tuition Protection Service (TPS) Sets out the provider-default route separately from the withdrawal route
A statement that the agreement and the complaints and appeals rights do not affect your rights to take action under the Australian Consumer Law if it applies Keeps consumer law remedies available alongside the internal process

There are also money details that sit outside refunds but feed disputes. The agreement must list all tuition fees payable, the periods those fees relate to and the payment options available — including, if permitted under the ESOS Act, that you may choose to pay more than 50 per cent of tuition fees before the course commences. Choosing to pay more upfront simply puts more at stake if the arrangement later unravels.

Non-tuition fees are covered too. The agreement must detail any non-tuition fees you may incur, including fees arising from reassessment of study outcomes, deferral of study, late payment of tuition fees, and other circumstances where additional fees may apply. When a provider deducts amounts you did not expect, this is the clause that shows whether they were disclosed.

Student default or provider default: why the label changes everything

These are defined terms, and they lead down different paths.

Student default Provider default
Core meaning The overseas student does not start a course, or withdraws from a course, as defined in section 47A(2) of the ESOS Act The registered provider fails to provide a course, or ceases to provide a course, within the meaning of section 46A of the ESOS Act
Where the refund answer comes from The refund terms in your written agreement, read with the ESOS Act Your provider-default refund terms plus the TPS arrangements explained in the agreement
What you should look for first The clause stating amounts that may or may not be repaid and the refund claim process The plain English explanation of what happens if the course is not delivered and the TPS role

Because the definitions are fixed by the Act rather than by the provider, a provider cannot rewrite what counts as "default" to suit itself — but the refund consequences that follow are still governed largely by what the agreement says.

How far can a refund complaint escalate?

Further than most people expect. The written agreement itself must outline the provider's internal and external complaints and appeals processes, so the escalation route is something you were entitled to receive in writing at enrolment. Standard 10 requires those processes to protect natural justice through access to professional, timely, inexpensive and documented complaints handling and appeals.

The ladder usually looks like this:

  1. Internal complaint and appeal — asking the provider to reconsider its own refund decision under its documented process.
  2. External complaint and appeal — the review step outside the provider, which the agreement must identify by Standard 3.3.7.
  3. Australian Consumer Law — the agreement is required to contain this statement: "This written agreement, and the right to make complaints and seek appeals of decisions and action under various processes, does not affect the rights of the student to take action under the Australian Consumer Law if the Australian Consumer Law applies".
  4. Regulatory consequences for the provider — the National Code has legal effect as expressly provided for by the ESOS Act, so breaches by a registered provider can result in action under Division 1A of Part 6 of the ESOS Act, including suspension or cancellation of registration. That regulates the provider; it is not the same thing as an order that your fee comes back to you.

Keep those last two ideas separate. Working through complaints and appeals does not use up your consumer law position, and regulatory enforcement against a provider is not a personal refund remedy.

What if the provider cannot deliver the course at all?

That is provider default territory, and it is the one route that does not depend on a negotiated deduction. Under Part A of the National Code, the TPS is a placement and refund service assisting overseas students whose registered providers are unable to fully deliver their course of study; it ensures students can either complete their studies in another course or with another registered provider, or receive a refund of their unspent tuition fees. The Commonwealth Department of Education and Training is responsible for the overarching policy development and administration of the ESOS Act framework, including the TPS framework and management of PRISMS.

Your written agreement has to explain this in plain English, including the role of the TPS. If it does not, that is itself a gap worth raising in any dispute about unpaid refunds.

Which evidence decides a refund dispute later?

Usually the paperwork you kept at the time. Standard 3 places the responsibility on you to keep a copy of the written agreement as supplied by the provider, plus receipts of any payments of tuition fees or non-tuition fees. In practice, the strongest file is boring and chronological:

  • the signed or accepted agreement, including any version you were given links to rather than text on the page (the Standard allows links only for supplementary material);
  • receipts for every payment, including amounts handed to an education agent on the provider's behalf, since those are within the refund clause;
  • the CoE, which confirms the course you were accepted into;
  • dated records of your refund claim and any outcome letters, so there is a documented trail of how the appeal was handled.

Providers have obligations on the other side too. They must retain records of all written agreements and receipts of payments made under them for at least 2 years after the person ceases to be an accepted student — which is why a late claim still has a paper trail to draw on.

While you are in Australia and studying with that provider, you have a duty under the agreement to keep the provider notified of your current residential address, mobile number (if any) and email address (if any), who to contact in emergencies, and any changes to those details within 7 days of the change. Because refund decisions and appeal outcomes travel to recorded contact details, stale contact details can quietly cost you the chance to respond.

Is the version you relied on still the current one?

The National Code 2018 was registered on 13 September 2017 and commenced on 1 January 2018, and it has been amended since. Its compilation history records the National Code of Practice for Providers of Education and Training to Overseas Students Amendment (Education Agent Commissions) Instrument 2026, registered 20 January 2026 and commencing 21 January 2026, which added Standards 4.7 and 4.8 and amended the Definitions; that instrument did not, on the face of the compilation history, rewrite the refund requirements in Standard 3.

Standard 3's refund content is therefore the version examined above as at September 2026. Amounts, thresholds and time limits that depend on the ESOS Act itself, or on later amendments to the Code, should always be checked against the official page in its current form rather than against any summary, including this one.

Frequently Asked Questions

Do I get a tuition refund if I withdraw from my course myself?

A personal withdrawal is student default, meaning the overseas student does not start or withdraws from a course as defined in section 47A(2) of the ESOS Act. Whether anything is repaid depends on the amounts your written agreement says may or may not be repaid, read consistently with the ESOS Act — the Code itself sets no fixed refund percentage. Nothing in the arrangement can remove your ability to complain, appeal, or take action under the Australian Consumer Law where it applies.

Are fees I paid through an education agent refundable?

Yes, potentially, because the refund clause covers amounts that may or may not be repaid including tuition and non-tuition fees collected by education agents on behalf of the registered provider. Treating money paid to an agent as separate from money paid to the provider is a common and avoidable mistake. Keep the agent receipt, since it forms part of the payment record you are responsible for keeping.

What happens if my provider stops delivering my course?

That is provider default: the registered provider fails to provide, or ceases to provide, the course within the meaning of section 46A of the ESOS Act. The TPS is the placement and refund service for that situation, ensuring you can either complete your studies in another course or with another registered provider or receive a refund of unspent tuition fees. Your agreement must explain that outcome in plain English, including the TPS role.

Can someone other than me receive my refund?

Possibly, because the agreement must specify people other than the overseas student who can receive a refund in respect of the student identified in the agreement, consistent with the ESOS Act. If someone else paid your fees, that clause decides whether repayment can legally be made to them. Check who is named before assuming a payment to a third party discharges the provider's obligation.

Does complaining or appealing mean I lose my Australian Consumer Law rights?

No. The agreement must state that the written agreement and the right to make complaints and seek appeals of decisions and action under various processes does not affect the student's rights to take action under the Australian Consumer Law where it applies. Using the internal process is therefore a step alongside those rights, not a substitute for giving them up. Keep records at each stage, since the appeals process is required to be documented.

Do I have to pay a late payment or deferral fee?

Only if the agreement has disclosed it. Non-tuition fees you may incur must be detailed, including fees due to reassessment of study outcomes, deferral of study, late payment of tuition fees, or other circumstances where additional fees may apply. A fee that never appeared in that disclosure is a much weaker claim than one that did.

I signed the agreement but never kept a copy — does that matter?

It does, because Standard 3 states you are responsible for keeping a copy of the written agreement as supplied by the provider, along with receipts of any payments. The provider must also retain records of agreements and receipts for at least 2 years after you cease to be an accepted student, so the document is usually still retrievable. Keeping your own copy simply means you are arguing from the same text everyone else is.

References

Common questions

Do I need a lawyer or a migration agent?+
Many visa applications are lodged directly. A registered migration agent or immigration lawyer helps with complex or refused matters.
What is a Section 48 bar?+
It limits the visas you can apply for while unlawfully in Australia after a refusal or cancellation. A professional can map your options.
Can I appeal a refused visa?+
Often yes — the Administrative Appeals Tribunal reviews many decisions, but strict time limits apply.
Free consultation

Get a clear answer now

Ask Aurum about your situation, or request a free consultation with a referrals pathway.

Free consultation